Growing Need for Design Collaboration and Construction Coordination

As uncertainty within the industry mounts, the need for collaboration and coordination is also growing. In both Australia and New Zealand we may find ourselves in a full design stage with condensed construction timelines as the ability to work on-site is restricted. This necessitates a design that minimises clashes and complications when it comes to construction. In Australia, projects are still forging ahead, however depending on how the Covid 19 pandemic develops, this may turn into complete restriction like that seen in New Zealand. As a result, we are seeing large amounts of design stage work being brought forward for proactive completion, in preparation for the time when the construction sector is again in unrestricted operation. This is going to lead to greater on-site pressure for fast and efficient construction. We have seen many examples of collaborative design decreasing these on-site complications, increasing speed and reducing cost. Rather than multiple designers and consultants working in silos, open communication is required more than ever, along with engagements that incentivise this.  In the interiors environment there are many players; Architects, interior designers, hydraulic designers, HVAC specialists, electrical supply, fire engineers, acoustic consultants, ceilings and partitions design, along with all the respective subcontractors who install these various aspects. In general there is too much ‘silo’ operation. Generally, engineers make specifications, designers pass on their details and avoid variations, subcontractors must construct as per plans or battle specifications for a more practical approach. Why does a consultant not consult across these stages for the best outcome; a building that is compliant and built with best practices while being built as efficiently as possible. Who benefits and how? In short, everyone benefits from collaboration and coordination. Architects or designers see less variations from original designs when construction practices are allowed for in the design. Subcontractors have more practical plans to build from, and a greater ability to request reasonable changes due to greater interaction directly with the consultant. Head contractors see fewer hold ups and less rework on site due to a more structured and well thought out process.  Why is it not done more widely? It seems harder and someone has to take accountability. Generally, every individual firm has their expertise and tries to stick to it. If every speciality works in silos, the area between can be contested. Often the less experienced party ends up taking the liability when there is crossover. With many different players in a project timeline this final liability is often murky at best. If there is an overarching consultant or professional practice willing to tie these components together from pre-design advice for interior engineering through to final construction of non-structural elements the responsibility is clearly defined. Reduce the volume of variations, clashes, rework, and complications during interior construction is where BVT specialises.  If you want to discuss how we can assist on a project to navigate the interior engineering construction and regulatory environment from design to construction, touch base.