Fall Arrest Systems: How Fall Protection Compliance Differs Between Australia and New Zealand
While both Australia and New Zealand adhere to similar fall protection standards, their approaches to enforcement and certification differ significantly. In New Zealand, independent third-party certification is a standard requirement, ensuring systems are verified from design (PS1) to final inspection (PS4). In contrast, Australia often relies on manufacturers' guidelines without the same level of oversight. This article explores why New Zealand takes a more rigorous approach to fall arrest compliance, the risks of minimal certification, and why elevating Australian practices could reduce liability and improve safety outcomes across the industry.